Research

Research is an integral part of our work at UMB. We understand that the current federal landscape is rapidly changing and that many of our valued faculty, staff, students, and postdoctoral fellows who engage in research activity are concerned about the potential impacts on their current and future work. This page will serve as a central location to provide current, verified information and updates related to federal actions.

National Institutes of Health Rate Cap for Indirect Costs | Federal Communication and Funding FreezeForeign Aid Pause and Dissolution of U.S. Agency for International Development | Resources and FAQs

Federal Orders and Court Actions

National Institutes of Health Rate Cap for Indirect Costs

All awards from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) include funding for indirect costs, or Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs. These are costs not specifically identifiable for (allocable to) any one project or program, but that are valid expenses of conducting research, instruction, and other sponsored activities. Examples of these costs are department administration, procurement, building maintenance, utilities, and library facilities. The F&A rates are pre-negotiated and included in each award contract. The NIH announced that going forward, the rate of support will now be 15 percent for new and existing grants. Because this action would impact existing contracts, lawsuits have been filed challenging the legality. 

March 5: Federal Judge Blocked NIH Cap on Indirect Rates 

A federal judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction, blocking implementation of a 15 percent cap on NIH F&A costs. A judge will hear full arguments related to the lawsuits before making a final ruling.

Feb. 26: Executive Order Issued Requiring Federal Agencies to Review All Existing Contracts 

A new executive order was issued requiring federal agencies, in consultation with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), to immediately review all existing contracts and grants considered discretionary. Reviews are to be completed within 30 days. The order further allows, where appropriate and consistent with applicable law, for the termination or modification (including through renegotiation) of such covered contracts and grants. In addition, agencies are now prevented from signing new contracts or modifying existing contracts without consultation with DOGE.

Feb. 21: Temporary Restraining Order Extended 

A federal judge in Massachusetts extended the TRO until further notice, providing more time for deliberation.

Feb. 10: Federal Judge Issued a Temporary Restraining Order 

A federal judge in Massachusetts issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) preventing the NIH from enacting the rate change.

Feb. 10: Lawsuit Filed Against NIH 

A lawsuit was filed by 22 state attorney generals against the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the NIH, seeking injunctive relief from the NIH and requesting that the rate cut be halted.

Feb. 7: NIH Issued a Notice That Indirect Costs Will be Capped at 15 Percent 

The NIH issued a notice that, effective immediately, all payments made by the NIH to universities, hospitals, research institutions, and other grantees for “indirect costs” — which include costs related to facilities and administration — will be capped at a 15 percent rate. The change applies to both new and existing grant awards, retroactive to the date of the guidance (Feb. 7).

Federal Communication and Funding Freeze

Following a series of executive orders, federal agencies took a number of actions to pause external communications and some operations. This included the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) freezing spending on all federal loans and grants. This action was intended to provide time to review federal funding and ensure spending aligns with current executive branch priorities. Because federal funding is appropriated by Congress (the legislative branch), lawsuits have been filed challenging the legality of the executive branch to issue such a directive.

In addition, agencies were directed to refrain from sending any document to the Federal Register until review and approval by a Presidential appointee. Publication to the Federal Register is a required step before study sections and advisory councils can meet to evaluate and approve grant applications. The last NIH-related postings to the Federal Register occurred on Jan. 21. Additionally, according to the NIH website, 42 study sections and panels have been canceled.

March 6: NIH Announced Plan to Centralize Peer Review 

The NIH announced plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency’s Center for Scientific Review in an effort to reduce spending and improve efficiency of the review process.

Feb. 10: Temporary Restraining Order Reinforced 

In response to claims that federal agencies were continuing to improperly freeze federal funds, the federal judge in Rhode Island reinforced the temporary restraining order (TRO) and ordered the administration to immediately restore frozen funding PDF.

Feb. 4: The Department of Health and Human Services Issued Guidance for External Communications 

The Department of Health and Human Services issued internal guidance and procedures allowing certain external communications, travel, and grant reviews to resume.

Jan. 31: Temporary Restraining Order Issued 

A federal judge in Rhode Island granted a TRO blocking the administration from freezing federal loans, grants, and other financial assistance under awards and obligations to provide federal financial assistance to the States.

Jan. 29: Office of Management and Budget Rescinded Memo 

OMB rescinded its memo, but continued to pause certain federal financial assistance.

Jan. 28: Federal Judge Issued a Temporary Stay  

A federal judge in the District of Columbia issued a temporary stay on the OMB memo, pausing implementation with respect to the disbursement of Federal funds under all open awards.

Jan. 27: Office of Management and Budget Issues a Memo to Pause Certain Activities 

The OMB issued a memo directing federal agencies to temporarily pause all activities related to federal financial assistance or that may be implicated by recent executive orders.

Jan. 21: Department of Health and Human Services Issues Memo Pausing External Communications 

DHHS issued a memo PDF pausing public communications from all DHHS agencies—including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). Staff in these agencies were instructed to suspend all work-related travel and grant reviews.

Foreign Aid Pause and Dissolution of U.S. Agency for International Development

An executive order related to U.S. foreign aid instituted a 90-day pause (which goes through April 19) in funding to review each foreign assistance program to determine efficiency and consistence with US foreign policy. The order allowed for limited waivers at the discretion of the Secretary of State. The order applies to grants, contracts, and agreements funded through the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs budget and includes the federal funding for U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and other U.S. government global health programs.

Simultaneously, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was dismantled through a series of actions (including terminating staff, shutting down the website, and closing the USAID building). This impacts USAID’s ability to implement the TROs that have been granted to un-freeze foreign aid funding for existing programs or to resume PEPFAR and humanitarian assistance interventions that receive waivers for work deemed to be lifesaving in nature.

March 5: Supreme Court Orders Trial Judge to Clarify Obligations 

March 5: The Supreme Court issued a brief order on the presidential administration’s request to freeze foreign aid funding. The case was returned to the trial judge to “clarify what obligations the government must fulfill.”

Feb. 26: Presidential Administration Ordered to Resume Frozen Foreign Aid Payments 

Per the Feb. 13 TRO, the presidential administration had been ordered to resume frozen foreign aid payments by the end of the day on Wednesday, Feb. 26. In response, the administration filed an emergency motion for an immediate administrative stay which was granted by the Supreme Court. Simultaneously, the administration terminated nearly 10,000 foreign assistance awards under the State Department and USAID. The canceled awards include 90 percent of USAID’s contracts and grants, including many of those that had been previously waived from the 90-day review due to their humanitarian and lifesaving objectives. The 90-day foreign assistance review was set to conclude April 19.

Feb. 20: Temporary Restraining Order Reaffirmed 

The Feb. 13 TRO was reaffirmed, reiterating the court’s expectation of compliance with the TRO. The TRO also announced that a hearing would be held by March 4. The TRO will be in place through March 10 (or until the Court resolves the matter).

Feb. 13: Temporary Restraining Order Issued to Prevent the Freezing of Funds and Termination or Suspension of Work 

In response to the Feb. 10 and 11 lawsuits, a TRO was issued, preventing the freezing of funds and termination or suspension of work related to awards that were in existence as of Jan. 19, 2025.

Feb. 13: Temporary Restraining Order Related to USAID Staffing Extended  

The TRO from Feb. 7, related to USAID staffing, was extended through Feb. 21.

Feb. 11: Lawsuit Filed Challenging Executive Order to Freeze Foreign Aid and Dissolve USAID 

A lawsuit was filed on behalf of several U.S. organizations challenging the executive order and subsequent actions freezing foreign aid and dissolving USAID.

Feb. 10: Lawsuit Filed by Organizations Seeking Emergency Relief from Funding Freeze 

A lawsuit was filed on behalf of two U.S. organizations seeking emergency relief from the freeze on funding for foreign assistance.

Feb. 7: Temporary Restraining Order Prevents USAID Staff From Being Placed on Leave or Evacuated 

In response to the Feb. 6 lawsuit, a TRO was issued (to expire Feb. 14), preventing the government from placing additional USAID staff on leave or evacuating staff back to the U.S., and requiring reinstatement of all staff already placed on leave. The court did not grant a TRO on the foreign assistance funding freeze.

Feb. 6: Lawsuit Filed Challenging Foreign Aid Freeze and Placing USAID Staff and Support Contractors on Leave 

lawsuit was filed challenging the foreign aid funding freeze, the plan to put most USAID staff on leave, and the fact that USAID staff and institutional support contractors had already been placed on leave.

Feb. 4: Limited Waiver Granted for Lifesaving Global Health Programs Beyond PEPFAR 

Some additional services for other global health programs beyond PEPFAR were granted a limited waiver. These programs, which were deemed life-saving, address tuberculosis, malaria, acute risks of maternal and child mortality (including severe acute malnutrition), and other life-threatening diseases and health conditions.

Feb. 1: President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Granted a Limited Waiver  

PEPFAR was granted a limited waiver allowing for some services to resume during the pause. Specifically, the waiver was granted to life-saving HIV care and treatment services as well as prevention of mother-to-child transmission services.

Jan. 28: Secretary of State Issued Blanket Waiver for Lifesaving Humanitarian Assistance Programs  

The Secretary of State issued a blanket waiver for lifesaving humanitarian assistance programs and outlined a process for requesting additional waivers. The waiver does not apply to activities that involve abortions, family planning, conferences, gender or DEI ideology programs, transgender surgeries, other non-life saving assistance, or some administrative costs.

Jan. 24: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Issued Notice on Implementation of the Executive Order 

A Notice on Implementation of the Executive Order was issued by U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), calling for stop work orders to be issued for all existing foreign assistance awards (not just new obligations and disbursements).

Resources

General

Research

International Affairs

FAQs

Should I Stop My Research Activities If They Involve Federal Funding? 

No, unless you have received a stop work order, you should not stop working on any sponsored awards. Please continue preparing and submitting proposals according to the published agency deadlines.

What Should I Do If I Receive a Stop Work Order? 

If you receive a stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive from an authorized official of a Sponsor — either a United States Government (USG) Sponsor or Pass-Through-Entity (PTE) — send it immediately by email to Jill Frankenfield, MSL, MS, associate vice president, Sponsored Programs Administration, and Laura ScarantinoMSF, CPA, assistant vice president, Office of Sponsored Projects Accounting and Compliance, copying your department chair and school dean. They will, with guidance from the Office of University Counsel, review the contents, determine its applicability, and provide guidance on how to proceed.

Please note that some stop work orders, suspension notices, or equivalent communications are currently subject to federal injunction orders and may not be legally applicable at this time.  

If you are provided guidance that your project is subject to a stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive that has not been enjoined by an injunction, no work should be charged against the grant until official notification lifting the order has been received from an authorized official or until you receive further clarification from Jill Frankenfield or Laura Scarantino.

The cost of any work performed during the effective period of a stop work order or a suspension order that is not subject to the injunction referenced above may not be paid by the Sponsor.

During a stop work or suspension, recipients are expected to maintain operational readiness to resume work if and when the order is lifted. Deliverables in the contract/agreement may or may not be negotiable upon resumption of the award. It is therefore important to approach contingency planning, bridge funding, project de-scoping, and budget realignment carefully to ensure the ability to resume implementation immediately if approved.

Note: Only USG Contract Officers, Agreement Officers, and PTE Authorized Organizational Representatives have binding contract authority. Communications and instructions from a Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative, or other USG or PTE technical or program office representative, are not binding. 

Stop Work Orders and Human Subjects Research 

If UMB Is the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Record:

If you receive a stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive from an authorized official of a Sponsor, immediately notify the IRB in addition to forwarding the stop work or suspension notice to Jill Frankenfield and Laura Scarantino, as described above. 

You must notify the IRB by utilizing the Reportable New Information pathway in CICERO; select #9 “Suspension or termination of the research by the sponsor or the investigator."

Include the following information: 

  • attach the written stop work order, suspension, or equivalent directive 
  • the number and status of participants 
  • the overall status of the research project
  • the potential impact on the rights, welfare, and safety of participants resulting from the stop work, suspension, or equivalent directive
  • the potential impact on the collection of study data and overall study integrity

All stop work orders, suspensions, or equivalent directives will be reviewed by a fully convened panel of the IRB for review.

If an External IRB Serves as the IRB of Record:

If you receive a stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive from an authorized official of a Sponsor, immediately notify the IRB in addition to forwarding the stop work or suspension notice to Jill Frankenfield and Laura Scarantino, as described above.

You must notify the IRB by utilizing the Reportable New Information pathway in CICERO; select #14 “Determination...Suspension or termination at UMB (External IRB studies ONLY)”

Include the following information: 

  • attach the written stop work order, suspension, or equivalent directive
  • the number and status of participants 
  • the overall status of the research project
  • potential impact on the rights, welfare, and safety of participants resulting from the stop work, suspension, or equivalent directive
  • potential impact on the collection of study data and overall study integrity

All stop work orders, suspensions, or equivalent directives will be reviewed by a fully convened panel of the IRB for review.

Stop Work Orders and Animal Subjects  

If you receive a stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive from an authorized official of a Sponsor, immediately notify the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in addition to Jill Frankenfield and Laura Scarantino, as described above, utilizing the following mechanisms:

For paper protocols, submit via email at iacuc@umaryland.edu and include the following information: 

  • IACUC number
  • number of animals on study and being maintained in animal facilities
  • overall status of the research project
  • potential impact on study data and overall study integrity
  • potential impact on the animals

For CICERO protocols, submit via the system utilizing the following pathway:

  • Open your protocol
  • Click the button “Contact IACUC Staff” found in the left navigation menu
  • Enter text as described above
  • Attach the stop work order, suspension notice, or equivalent directive
  • Click “OK” to submit

If you have questions or concerns regarding the care and disposition of your animals, contact the Office of Animal Welfare Assurance at iacuc@umaryland.edu.

All stop work orders, suspensions, or equivalent directives will be reviewed by a fully convened panel of the IACUC for review.