Recommended Resources
Justice White and the Politics of Roe v. Wade
March 2, 2023
This article, written by Academy of Lifelong Learning featured expert Professor Robert Percival, was published in The Wall Street Journal on Sept. 21, 2022.
Your editorial “Elena Kagan’s ‘Political’ Court” (Sept. 16) criticizes Justice Kagan for decrying the politicization of the Supreme Court. You assert that the court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade (1973) wasn’t a political decision, noting that it actually has dimmed Republican electoral prospects. But Justice Kagan wasn’t making a political forecast. She was decrying the partisan polarization in the public’s perception of the court, which is confirmed by the polling data that you cite.
Despite your claim that “Roe’s logic was entirely political,” Roe wasn’t a political decision. When it was decided, the court didn’t have sharp ideological or partisan splits.
Read the complete article in The Wall Street Journal.
Robert Percival, JD, MA, is the Robert F. Stanton Professor of Law and director of the University of Maryland Franics King Carey School of Law's Environmental Law Program. After graduating from law school, Percival clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron R. White.
Read more
Face to Face: The Impact of Overturning Roe v. Wade
March 2, 2023
On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered the most significant ruling in recent memory in a Mississippi abortion law case (Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization).
Face to Face: Abortion Rights Under Attack
March 2, 2023
UMB President Bruce Jarrell speaks with three faculty members from the Francis King Carey School of Law about what could be the most significant Supreme Court ruling in recent memory.
Criminalized Survivors Deserve Sentencing Reform
March 2, 2023
Although it might sound counterintuitive to some, sentencing reform is necessary to effectively address intimate partner violence and support victims.
Justice White and the Politics of Roe v. Wade
March 2, 2023
Byron White opposed creating new constitutional rights, but he didn’t think the court should take back rights once they were well-established.